The Geopolitical Challenges to Pakistan's National Security
The Civil Dimension
According to
investigative journalist Steve Coll’s article in the New Yorker, India, and
Pakistan, after intensive track II diplomacy, had very nearly reached an
agreement that would have demilitarized Jammu & Kashmir. The proposed
agreement called for the creation of an autonomous region in which residents
could move freely and conduct trade on both sides of the territorial boundary.
Over time, the border would become irrelevant, and declining violence would allow
a gradual withdrawal of tens of thousands of troops that now face one another
across the region's mountain passes. The stillborn plan was the only feasible
solution to the complex Kashmir problem. Pending a just solution to the J&K
dispute, Pakistan needs to build up international pressure against India and utilize UN resolutions wherever possible.
Pakistan should
continue to work with the US, Russia, and China, the three major strategic
players, for pulling Afghanistan out of its present isolation and using its
influence with the Taliban to open up the Afghan society.
If, in the past,
Pakistan's airspace could be provided for the US military operations in
Afghanistan, why cannot a land route be provided to India for its trade with
Afghanistan? As an incentive to India and Afghanistan, Pakistan should
link the transit trade through its territory to 1) A win-win solution to the
Jammu &Kashmir dispute with India; 2) Recognition of the Durand Line as the
International border by Afghanistan.
Once a comprehensive Afghanistan
-Pakistan- India agreement on the regional disputes and issues is reached,
Pakistan and China should invite the US and India to join the CPEC by removing
the US sensitivities and India's concerns about it.
The Arab-Israel dispute is a thing of the past. The Arab countries have ended their more than half a century old boycott of Israel. Pakistan should take a realistic view of its geopolitical environment and revisit its policy on Israel. Why is it imperative for Pakistan to initiate a dialogue with Israel?
There are four reasons for it:-
1. India, Pakistan's
archenemy, has a strategic relationship with Israel. The relationship allows
India access to the cutting-edge Israeli military technologies purloined from
the United States.
2. The recent US warming-up to India, and the resultant US
resentment against Pakistan, is a function of the Indo-
Israeli strategic paradigm.
3. In the not-too-distant future, Pakistan will need Israel to
deal with the threat from Iran. In this regard, there is greater
convergence of aims between Pakistan and Israel than between
India and Israel. After all, there is also an Indo – Iranian strategic
relationship.
4. Apart from clichés, Pakistan will be better poised to help the
Palestinians if it has diplomatic relations with Israel.
Therefore, Pakistan
should consider establishing diplomatic relations with Israel to 1) Dilute the
Indo-Israeli strategic relationship; 2) Counterbalance the Indo-Iranian
strategic relationship.
The Military Dimension
Do not provoke an armed
confrontation with India. Nevertheless, keep the powder dry. Be prepared all
the time to take on India if it threatens military action across the
LOC, Working Boundary, and the international border. Pakistan
Army is holding the LoC with force and determination. Pakistan's strategy, it
appears, is to let the Indian Army fight and remain embroiled with the
Kashmiri freedom fighters.
We should have a
proactive military response along the western border with Iran and Afghanistan,
based on forceful retaliation. Pakistan is not in a position to declare Afghan
and Iranian territories close to the international border as its Security
Zones. However, it can interdict the insurgents operating from these
territories through drones and artillery fire. This will be a calculated risk
that Pakistan will have to take, sooner or later.
Saleem Akhtar
Malik
1 February 2022
References:
1. Bazaz, S. (2009). Greater Ladakh vs Union Territory. Greater Kashmir. Retrieved from www.greaterkashmir.com.
2. Col,S.(2009). The Back Channel- India and Pakistan’s Secret Kashmir Talks. The New Yorker.
3. Dashti,
N. (2007). The Baloch and Balochistan: A Historical Account from the
Beginning to the Fall of the Baloch State. Trafford Publishing. p. 280.
4.
Habitat (2012).
HFH Sri Lanka to Build 100 homes in war-torn north-east in partnership with
International Indian Film Academy.retrieved from www.habitat.org.
5.
Hathaway, M. (2014). The “strategic partnership”
between India and Iran. Woodrow Wilson Centre.
6. Nicholas, S. (2007). "Waiting
for the prosperity: Baluchistan, 2006".Virginia
Quarterly Review.
7.
PTI. (2014).Pakistan funding terrorism in India,
sheltering underworld don Dawood Ibrahim: Rajnath Singh. Indian Express.Retrieved from www.indianexpress.com.
8.
Raman, B. (2012). The
Kao Boys of R&AW: Down Memory Lane. Lancer Publishers.
9.
Rajnath,
A. (2004). BJP used underworld for terrorism in Pakistan, Indian officials
admit. SouthAsian Tribune.Retrieved from www, southasiatribune.com.
10. Siddiqui,
F.H. (2012). The
Politics of Ethnicity in Pakistan: The Baloch, Sindhi and Mohajir Ethnic
Movements
Comments
Post a Comment